Los Angeles County Hospital

Los Angeles County Hospital

Monthly Paper Selection

Journal RSS (FEEDS):

By following the link below, you will be redirected to my Bloglines website. I set up a page with FEEDS from the main Rheumatology Journals, Internal Medicine Journals and Immunology Basic Science Journals: http://www.bloglines.com/public/brunostoliver In addition, I made available some FEEDS from Rheumatology Journals below, but be aware that this is not a complete list of each Journal issue. To get the complete list, click in the link above and you will be redirected to bloglines.com

Medscape Rheumatology Headlines

Physician's First Watch: Current Issue

Arthritis & Rheumatism

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases current issue

Rheumatology - current issue

Current Opinion in Rheumatology - Current Table Of Contents

CER - Recent Issue

Arthritis Research & Therapy - Latest articles

JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology - Current Table Of Contents

Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology

Lupus current issue

Journal Links (Blogroll from Bloglines)

Rheumatology Journals Schedule

  • Arthritis and Rheumatism: Monthly
  • Annals of Rheumatic Disease (The EULAR Journal): Monthly
  • Journal of Rheumatology: bi-weekly (only e-mail TOC/no RSS)
  • Rheumatology (Oxford): Monthly
  • Current Opinion in Rheumatology (COR): 6 issues/year (bi-monthly)
  • Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology (CER): 6 issues/year (bi-monthly)
  • Arthritis Research and Therapy: 6 issues/year (bi-monthly)
  • Journal of Clinical Rheumatology: 6 issues/year (bi-monthly)
  • Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology: 6 issues/year (bi-monthly) !No issues since July 2006
  • Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America: (4-5 reviews/year): Receive e-mail TOC. No RSS.
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism: 6 issues/year (bi-monthly)+ 2 Supplements: Receive e-mail TOC. No RSS.
  • Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology: Monthly
  • Lupus Journal: Monthly

Internal Medicine Journals Schedule

  • Archives of Internal Medicine: Bi-weelky (Monday)
  • Annals of Internal Medicine: No RSS available: Bi-weekly (Tuesday) (only e-mail TOC)
  • JAMA: Weekly (Wednesday)
  • NEJM: Weekly (Thursday)
  • Lancet: Weekly (Friday)
  • British Medical Journal: Weekly (Saturday)

Monday, May 14, 2007

Arthritis and Rheumatism (May 2007)

B cell depletion may be more effective than switching to an alternative anti-tumor necrosis factor agent in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom the response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is inadequate have several therapeutic options, such as switching to an alternative anti-TNF agent or initiating B cell-depleting therapy with rituximab (RTX). Although both therapeutic options have been proven effective in trials, no head-to-head comparisons are available. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of RTX with that of an alternative anti-TNF agent in the management of patients with RA who had an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapy.This prospective cohort study was nested within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management RA cohort and included all patients who had an inadequate response to at least 1 anti-TNF agent and subsequently received either 1 cycle of RTX or an alternative anti-TNF agent. The primary outcome was the evolution of RA disease activity (as measured on the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28]), which was analyzed using multivariate regression models for longitudinal data.One hundred sixteen patients with RA were included; 50 patients received 1 cycle of RTX, and 66 patients were treated with a second or a third alternative anti-TNF agent. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, sex, disease duration, and disease activity. Evolution of the DAS28 was more favorable in the group that received RTX compared with the group that received an alternative anti-TNF agent (P = 0.01). At 6 months, the mean decrease in the DAS28 was -1.61 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.97, -1.25) among patients receiving RTX and -0.98 (95% CI -1.33, -0.62) among those receiving subsequent anti-TNF therapy.The results of this observational study suggest that treatment with RTX may be more effective than switching to an alternative anti-TNF agent in patients with RA in whom active disease persists despite anti-TNF therapy.

No comments: